Evaluation Question 3 Final

Throughout creating our music video and ancillary products, from the planning to filming the draft and then filming our final music video, Ceri and I have used our audience feedback greatly to develop our music video and further products. At all stages of this process we have found our audience feedback to be very useful, allowing us to understand and acknowledge aspects of our work that we had bypassed. 

Music Video Pitch Evaluation Question 3 from Steph2000 
As shown in the pie chart above, only 1 person out of the 15 feedback sheets we received did not mention any issues we may have had filming in a Church. With this strong evidence and advice Ceri and I were able to carefully consider our idea. 

 

This graph represents the amount of positive and encouraging comments that we received regarding our artist, clothing, theme and lighting choice for our music video. This gave Ceri and and I more confidence within our work and ideas.

Our next key piece of audience feedback was regarding our draft video. After Ceri and I had submitted our draft music video we received both feedback from our peers and from our teachers. While our teachers did not fully fit our target audience, their expertise and knowledge aided us significantly. The points raised by our teachers were that: we needed a title shot, we needed to include more close up shots, to include more movement within our shots and to integrate the presence of the singer with the dancer’s together better. In particular from this audience feedback Ceri and I took on-board the need for closer shots which involve more movement and to re-plan the sections where both our artist and dancers are present. After comparing this feedback to professional videos, both Ceri and I realised how static our own video was and how this was dull and un-interesting to watch.

Below are Instagram accounts I have created for the purpose of audience feedback, all quoting and following the advice given to us by our audience. The caption of the post, which is our video, is the audience feedback we received and different accounts show each individual person.










Aided massively by our audience feedback Ceri and I were able to realise how important it was to include more close up shots, to convey the emotion of the performers to our audience, and how this would help improve our video. This point of needing to include more shots that demonstrated the emotion, particularly of the dancers, was also represented in feedback from our target audience demographic. In our draft, we only had a few shots of each dancer separately; our target audience feedback and teacher feedback highly encouraged that we should include more shots like this as it was one of the, if not the most, effective and best shot in the video. Ceri and I greatly learnt from this and as shown in our final product there are far more solo shots and empathise of each dancer.   Ceri and I re-planned our video, deciding which shots we needed to change and improved and then worked hard to assure these shots were improved, using a dolly to help with smooth movement in the shots and scheduling for three more filming days. Due to this key audience feedback Ceri and I were able to make improvements our video, creating the best version for our final product. Adding a title scene was a shot Ceri and I completely overlooked adding and with this feedback we were able to add this shot, helping our music video to look as professional as possible.



Audience feedback that we received from our peers, that fit our target audience demographic more as they were in the 16-24 age bracket, both male and female and interested in the indie genre, also greatly helped us in creating our final music video. There were many similarities across the feedback from our target audience and from teachers, which heightened these points to us, demonstrating the need for improvement. Both professional advice and suggestions from our target audience suggested that in the draft video, the shots with our artist and the dancers did not work. Our artist looked awkwardly placed, as if she didn’t fit to the scene and this meant our music video didn’t flow well. Using our audience feedback to solve this Ceri and I cut the section where our artist walks onto the stage through the dancers and instead, used shots moving from left to right and half circular shots to film the sections of both performers together. Upon asking our target audience for feedback on how this looked in our final video, we received far more positive feedback as they much preferred this way of filming these sections and felt the music video looked more professional. Another area where suggestions were made from both parties was regarding adding movement/more of a variation of shots as in our draft video was very static and stationary look which was not enjoyable to watch. Our target audience suggested adding more angles to solve this and this was advice that Ceri and I took onboard.



Editing was also an issue raised by our target audience; they felt that the cut edits, which we used throughout the entirety of the draft video, were too harsh and stopped the video from feeling continuous and professional. We improved this by choosing to use the Cross Dissolve transition instead of just harsh cut edits; again this change was very positively received by our target audience as they found this editing technique to be far more effective. Slightly shaky shots were also picked up on from our target audience feedback; Ceri and I were also able to identify this and make amendments to change this. Originally we has used a steady-cam to film sections of the video however both of us had struggled to operate this so had also used simple hand held shots. This created a shaky effect that we did not want in the video, nor did it please our target audience, so for the final video we broadened our use of different equipment and tried using a dolly. As essentially a tripod on wheels, Ceri and I were wary and careful of using this however using the dolly resulted in being one of the most influentially helpful decisions we made. Mixed in with the fair bit of trial and error with the dolly, we were able to achieve the shots we and our target audience wanted. Without our audience feedback highlighting the shakiness we would have not attempted to use the dolly, showing the great influence our audience feedback had on creating our final product. 


    


We also carried positives from our teacher and target market feedback from our draft video into our final video; both liked the few shots that did have movement in such as the full and half circular shots. By identifying what our target audience liked and enjoy watching Ceri and I were able to develop an greater understanding of what we should continue to include in the final video and what we needed to change, which helped us massively in planning our final video. Similarly, both performances of our dancers and our artist were always fed-back positively, with no complaints or changes needed. The dance routine and singing were seen as genuine and authentic to professional level. The costume choice for the dancers, the stained glass window motif, the lighting and the general theme/concept of the video were elements that were all praised and effective as noted in our audience feedback. This gave Ceri and me the assurance to carry on with these ideas into our final product with more confidence and passion.
There was some feedback from our audience that Ceri and I chose to regard with less prominence. A piece of feedback that we received from two males aged 16 and 17, however neither overly interest in the indie genre, suggested having a different background in parts of the video and to use different lighting. Ceri and I chose to overrule these suggestions as we personally felt this would cause disjunction within our video and that our video would no longer flow or look effective. Our decision to not follow this advice is further supported by a larger proportion of the audience feedback we received thoroughly liked the placement and duration of the stained glass window motif and lighting and believed this was a definite element that needed to remain into our final video. Furthermore, this feedback came from people who are not interested or knowledgeable within the indie genre, meaning it may be merely be their personal dislike/preference to other genres that lead to them to having this view. This means their feedback is less valuable, as it is less specific to our genre.

Another piece of feedback we only partially acted upon was feedback regarding our artist’s costume/outfit choices. While we did accept advice on no longer including the statement cardigan within the final video, due to reasoning that the cardigan did not work and clashed with the costumes of dancers (a point that Ceri and I understood and followed), we did not go on to include the outfit changes as suggested. We received feedback from outside our target audience that we should consider changing our artists outfit at points throughout the video. Ceri and I were discouraged from this view as we felt, as during video as we do not change our location at any point there was no obvious need to change outfit and similar to suggestions of background and lighting changes, we did not want to create discontinuity. Ceri and I followed up this view by asking more audiences, both within our target audience and outside, for more opinions and received responses that supported our view. Our audience feedback agreed that due to no change in location, there was not an overwhelming reason to change costume. Some felt that a change in costume would neither enhance nor degrade our video, merely remaining the same standard as no costume change, and others felt that a change in costume would make less sense and advised against this. After carefully considering this audience feedback, as Ceri and I found all feedback important and wanted to understand our audience feedback fully, Ceri and I chose to not change costume during the video. We were able to feel assured in our choice due to our personal preference and the further feedback we had received from other audiences. This is key example of how helpful and influential our audience feedback was in this process; by researching and questioning further to audiences Ceri and I were able to make informed and assured decisions for our final music video.                

In conclusion, without audience feedback I would have been unable to adequately create my products. Particularly for the music video Ceri and I have found the audience feedback to be a massive help and guidance, of which our final product would have not benefitted from had we not gained audience feedback. Both feedback from teachers and our target audience, verbal and written, formal and informal has been a vital part of our process. Ceri and I have chosen to not follow some audience feedback, however this has happened rarely and we have used further feedback in these cases, allowing us to make decisions in confidence. For all of my products my audience feedback has highlighted positives and assured me of my choices and plans going forward. I am able to credit a lot of improvements to my products as due to audience feedback and audience feedback has been a highly important part of this process.    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Different Genres

5 Potential Songs